Letter identification processes in reading: Distractor interference reveals an automatically engaged, domain-specific mechanism.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recent neuroimaging studies have revealed that letters activate both the left and the right fusiform areas, but that only the left fusiform responds to letters more than to control stimuli (Cohen et al., 2003). Though these findings suggest that the left fusiform is specialized in its function of identifying letters, it does not rule out the possibility that the right fusiform contributes critically to letter identification processes. We used a behavioural word identification task in which we compared bilateral and unilateral displays to determine the cost of engaging the right hemisphere with a distractor stimulus. We found that while engaging the left hemisphere led to a robust interference effect, engaging the right hemisphere had no effect at all. We were able to rule out an attentional bias to the right visual field as a possible explanation of the asymmetrical interference effect. We conclude that while the right hemisphere may be able to assume letter identification processing responsibilities in some patients with brain damage, the right hemisphere does not contribute critically to abstract letter identification processes in healthy right-handed individuals.
منابع مشابه
Right Visual Field Attentional Bias in Reading in Children and Adults
The identification of parafoveal words is better in the right visual field (RVF) than in the left visual field (LVF) [4]. In experiments using the identification of parafoveal words, attention is not necessarily distributed symmetrically in the state of expectancy prior to the presentation of each stimulus. The RVF superiority may be, at least partially, explained by an attentional bias in favo...
متن کاملSocial Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference
Human faces automatically attract visual attention and this process appears to be guided by social group memberships. In two experiments, we examined how social groups guide selective attention toward in-group and out-group faces. Black and White participants detected a target letter among letter strings superimposed on faces (Experiment 1). White participants were less accurate on trials with ...
متن کاملAge differences in reading with distraction: sensory or inhibitory deficits?
Two experiments examined how sensory acuity affects age differences in susceptibility to interference in the reading-with-distraction task. In both experiments, older and younger adults read texts in an italic font and were required to ignore distractor words in an upright font. Experiment 1 examined whether the age-related increase in distractibility can be simulated in younger adults by reduc...
متن کاملThe relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis.
This study used data from 220 adults to examine the relations among 3 inhibition-related functions. Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that Prepotent Response Inhibition and Resistance to Distractor Interference were closely related, but both were unrelated to Resistance to Proactive Interference. Structural equation modeling, which combined Prepotent Response Inhibition and Resistance to D...
متن کاملDomain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
Previous research has shown that loading information on working memory affects selective attention. However, whether the load effect on selective attention is domain-general or domain-specific remains unresolved. The domain-general effect refers to the findings that load in one content (e.g. phonological) domain in working memory influences processing in another content (e.g., visuospatial) dom...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive neuropsychology
دوره 23 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006